On September 13, 2005, John Roberts, President Bush's nominee for Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding legal services for poor and middle-class Americans. Senator Herb Kohl (D-WI) asked Judge Roberts, "Do you agree that for our nation's working people securing civil justice is often rendered substantially much more difficult because it simply costs too much?" Judge Roberts' response is re-printed below.

ROBERTS: "You know, I do think that the availability of legal services is not as broad and widespread as it should be. There are so many things and areas where I think lawyers could make a valuable contribution, but it's too expensive. There are a number of responses that I think the bar should be taking. Obviously, for those at the lowest end of the income scale, I think there's an obligation to provide pro bono legal services. I think the big firms, little firms, medium firms, everybody needs to get involved in that. There's not enough appreciation about how you can do that. For example, everybody thinks in terms of bringing a big case, litigation. You know, lawyers who do estate work can provide extremely valuable pro bono services. Lawyers who do tax work can provide extremely valuable pro bono services. The whole range of services -- corporate work. I know lawyers in my old firm would do a lot of pro bono services helping set up nonprofit organizations, ensuring that they're complying with the law. People need to be a little more creative in the ways in which they can help. I regard that as an obligation of the bar. And I do think that in fact in many cases the situation you get is the people at the lowest end have access to pro bono services. People at the highest end can pay. And it's the people in the middle who are left without legal services that could be extremely valuable. And I do think the bar needs to do more. I think firms need to do more. Individual lawyers need to do more."